Song Review: "Flashback" by Miyavi (ft. KenKen)

Does anyone else remember when music was supposed to be good? Japanese guitarist Miyavi apparently remembers. On November 7th, 2017, Miyavi released Samurai Sessions Vol. 2 and it is amazing. This album is heavily influenced by Pop and Electronic music yet still holds on to its Rock edge. Long story short, give it a listen. It is seriously amazing and if I knew this existed when I did my Year End Retrospective, this would've most certainly been on the Best Songs of the Year category, undoubtedly. If you're still not convinced, the best way I can sum it up is: It's like "Something Just Like This" combining Electronic Music and Rock... but its actually original and creative. And/or I could say that it is like "Thunder" by Imagine Dragons... but Not terrible. If those comparisons don't convince you, then allow me to demonstrate to you why this album should be listened to by analyzing the most popular song of the album: "Flashback"

Where do I even begin...? "Flashback" is a collaboration between Miyavi and Japanese bass player KenKen. Now, if I'm completely honest, songs like "Forget You" and "No Thanks Ya" would be more of the breakout hits under normal circumstances as they are more traditionally Pop (still with a Rock edge). Those songs are more reminiscent of Rihanna and Nicki Minaj whereas "Flashback" is still Pop, but it is quite an odd song. "Flashback" had something that the other songs didn't. however: A vessel. "Flashback" got as popular as it did because it is the opening of an anime called Kokkoku. While the anime was not particularly good (from what I understand, I haven't seen it), "Flashback" caught the attention of the anime community by being one of the best opening songs of the season (if not, the best).

How did "Flashback" achieve this? To make it easy on myself, I'm going to split the song into the A Section and the B Section. Keep in mind, a guitarist who plays slap and a bass player who plays slap playing on a song together, you are guaranteed an amazing funk-like groove. "Flashback" delivers immensely on that and even goes beyond by giving 10 times what it promised. The beat in the A Section and the B Section are both amazing, brimming with energy.  The beat and the groove are hard hittingly wonderful and it all stems from not only the musical composition but the fact that the bass and guitar are playing with so much fun over this beat that it is contagious. That is not to say that is its only strength. What makes the song so accessible is simplicity and the way it is written:
In the A Section we have a verse (an introduction with little instrumental accompaniment), the drop (where the beat, and the song, kick in), Repetition of the first verse (with full instrumental accompaniment), the drop (with added percussion), then the bridge into the B Section. It is a short song, and while it is musically complex, it's fun, catchy, energetic and contagious. The oddities begin from the moment the song kicks in (at the first drop): the bass plays a short riff, funky as expected from KenKen, but when played with Miyavi's guitar riff (aided with a Pitch Shifter, giving it a more electronic tone to the guitar) it sounds kind of disjointed, which is not helped by the drums which land the beat on the weak beat. At the drop, the song becomes very minimal, allowing you to hear this strange cacophony with no distractions. But it works. Why? Well, needless to say the drop is not actually disjointed, it's the bass and guitar riffs that create this illusion but it is just an illusion. The bass and guitar even share the first 2 notes of the riff before branching out into their separate paths and the back beat creates a funky/dance beat for it all to take place. The reason it's so minimal is because Miyavi wants to feel the groove, get familiarized with the beat before he adorns it later with more percussion and effects when we come back to it. Not to mention, that drop, the guitar riff played by Miyavi, is catchy as hell. Listen to it once and it'll be in your head for a while.

About one third through the song, the bridge leads in to the B Section where the music comes to a sudden stop. This section is actually very simple. It's only one stanza, 8 bars which repeat over, and over, and over again. A group of backup singers (which sound like children voices) sing:

                 Japanese Phonetic                                                         English Translation

" Don't Stop Modoranai Flashback                            " Don't Stop No Turning Back Flashback
  Look Up Kidzukeba It's all Past                                Look Up Realize It's all Past
  Too Fast Hikisakaresou sa Ahh~ Ahh~ "                  Too Fast We're Almost Torn Apart Ahh~ Ahh~ "

While simple, this is one of those cases where simplicity is best. The song repeats these 8 bars 9 times in total (I counted). It's 2 minutes of the same 8 bars. Doesn't it get boring? On principle, yes. In Practice, not only does it not get boring, it works wonderfully. The First time it plays, the only things you hear is the choir and a gentle synth laying out the chords. The Second time it plays, the bass kicks in with a funky (and very impressive) bass riff that creates tension as the kick drum marks the tempo. The Third time it comes around, the snare drum comes in laying the backbeat and the chords are now reinforced by the guitar making them clearer. The Fourth time it comes around its the kicker: everything up until now has been buildup to this moment and that's when the instruments come at full force as Miyavi plays some fills to accompany the rest of the song until the 6th repetition. Then he plays a guitar solo on top of all this on the 7th repetition where he plays this pretty dark harmonic riff to contrast the "funky party" feel of the song until the 9th repetition where the song once again comes back down to the choir and the guitar laying out the chords.

The reason why this repetition works and it's not tedious nor it gets boring is because the song is very dynamic and the repetition is used to build up to a climax and then come back down to a resolution. It's actually the same reason "Shape of You" works despite the song being literally one 8 bar riff. Like Ed Sheeran, Miyavi starts simple and as the song progresses through each part he adds something to keep the momentum going, yet he keeps it familiar. It is a way for us, the listener, to anchor ourselves and latch on to something as the artist keeps adding more and more stuff on top of this core. While Ed Sheeran does this throughout the entire song through very subtle ways, Miyavi makes explicit additions unto the song with each repetition. Starting simple and gradually adding the other elements to the song is a great way to make the song dynamic, and by the time we hit the climax (around repetition number 4) we are so familiarized with the song that all we have to do is jam with it. By the time the 9th repetition comes around and the song dials back down to a calmer note, we are left with a kind of "high".


"Flashback" is an amazing song, 10/10. If knew this existed when I did my year end review, any song from "Samurai Sessions vol. II" would've been easily my pick for best song of the year, but specially this one. This song is fun, energized, contagious, and an all around good time. Every time I listen to it, I have to play it again several times to satisfy that "high" this song gives. I didn't go into details of the lyrics because they aren't that important to the song. They're not particularly good per say (they aren't bad either). It just feels amazing to sing along (trust me). Safe to say that "Flashback" is all about the music: making sure the song sounds good and feels good. The lyrics, to me, are simply  means to that end. I had the honor to see this song being performed live and I guarantee the energy present in the album version is half of what it is like to listen this song Live. To me, it is such a shame that quality work like this is relegated to a niche market while in the mainstream we keep getting garbage like Maroon 5 and Imagine Dragons. Miyavi succeeded where other rock bands have failed: make a Pop album with a rock edge. Unlike Imagine Dragons's "Thunder" which highlights the worst that Rock and Pop can offer, Miyavi's "Flashback" highlights the best of what this combo can do for you. What can I say but give "Flashback" a listen. While you're at it, give the entire album a listen as well.

Song Review: "La Cantata del Diablo" by Mägo de Oz

If I were asked my top 3 favorite songs of all time, the songs that would come to mind are (from worst to best) "While My Guitar Gently Weeps" by The Beatles and "Bohemian Rhapsody" by Queen. The last song would be "La Cantata del Diablo" by Mägo de Oz. Now, let me come clean and clear up an argument that I'm sure someone will point out: Mägo de Oz is my favorite band of all time. Aren't I'm being biased to call this song "the best song of all time" because it's by my favorite band of all time? While that is a fair question, the answer is NO. Here's why:


1) This song is not my favorite song of all time because is by Mägo de Oz. Mägo de Oz is my favorite band of all time BECAUSE of this song. I will go into detail as to why this song is a masterpiece in this review, but for now let's make it clear that I'm not blinded by my "fanboy" mind.

2) If I am to be a critic, I MUST remain 100% objective when looking at any piece of work, regardless of who is it by. In fact, the arguments I despise the most are the ones defending a piece of work just because is made by this one renowned artist, like it has been the case with "Baby Driver" where the biggest argument in favor of it has been that it was made by Edgar Wright. "Baby Driver" is a terrible movie because it's a terrible movie and Edgar Wright has nothing to do with how good or bad this movie turned out to be.

3) I will admit when something is not good. Mägo de Oz is not perfect and they have made a lot of terrible music alongside great songs. In fact, there are bands I have more consistently praised like Wagakki-Band and Diablo Swing Orchestra than I have Mägo de Oz (to the point when people are surprised when I tell them that Mägo de Oz is indeed my favorite band).

4) This is mostly a disclaimer: "La Cantata del Diablo" has a lot of religious imagery and the song brutally attacks the Catholic Church (it even ends with a perversion of the Pater Noster prayer that serves as a giant middle finger to the church) so it'll be undoubtedly controversial. When talking about the lyrics, I will explain the context and how it's not really about religion at all but if you're getting offended just by reading this, then you should probably stop reading this. My suggestion would be keep an open mind and check the song out but if that's not what you want, you're free to do as you please.


"La Cantata del Diablo" was released in 2005 as the album closer for the second album in the Gaia Trilogy "Gaia II: La Voz Dormida". This is a monster of a song to review as it is 21 minutes and 11 seconds in length. Furthermore, I would call this song a "One Act Musical". Musically speaking, it has 3 lead singers, 3 guitars (acoustic and electric), 1 bass, 1 keyboard, 1 drummer, 1 lead violin and one lead flute, a band of bagpipes, and orchestra, and a choir. Wikipedia is also telling me the song also has a Caxixi, a Bodhrán, a Piccolo, and a Tamboril and although it's not listed, I can also hear a Rainstick. As far as I know, this song has only been performed live once and understandably so. "La Cantata del Diablo" doesn't have all these instruments just because. Mägo de Oz uses each one to create a mood and varying sonic textures to create a song with a wide dynamic range while shifting in tone and musical genre. "La Cantata del Diablo" is a masterpiece and it is 21 minutes because that's how long the song needed to be to give the music time to fully unravel and be displayed at its full potential. The song is also divided in movements/chapters and they each sound different, allowing the song to never become tiresome or boring.

On a general level, the music is beautifully composed and the symphonic aspects of the piece and the Heavy Metal aspects of the piece are not only handled wonderfully, but the relation between the two is fully taken advantage of. For instance, when the song starts (after the a big choir singing in latin), it starts with an acoustic guitar playing a sweet yet dark arpeggio (in D minor) while the flute and violin play the melody. It's a beautiful sound but it keeps an air of mystery and dread. Once the character of the inquisitor enters the stage, the heavy distorted guitars and the heavy beating drums come in changing the mood entirely from a dark eerie calm to a violent confrontation. It elevates to "base level" intensity which is more typical of what you'd expect from a power metal song, but never losing the theatricality as the characters sing back in forth to each other. When it comes back down, it returns to the calm but it's not eerie anymore. While still in D minor, the way the guitar is strummed (not fingerpicked) plus the addition of instruments like the Rainstick create a soothing tone (fitting as it is when the character supposedly dies and meets his god). On an individual level, the song has what you expect from top level musicians. While it is not Prog Rock solos, the solos in "La Cantata del Diablo" are superb, and everyone is forced to play. There are multiple guitar and keyboard solos but there is also a bass solo, bagpipes solo, and multiple flute and violin solos. Everyone gets to show off and it is so top notch that when they played it Live, many of the solos were changed (most of the musicians who played in this song were gone by the time they played it live). This was just a sample of what listening to "La Cantata del Diablo" is like. It is truly an experience that I cannot fully describe in a concise manner. Speaking of that only live version of the song, I can understand why. While, if I'm honest, it's not a complex Progressive Metal song with multiple strange time signatures and Jazz chords, it is a hard song to pull off AND to pull of well. When Mägo de Oz decided to play it live it was because they had the right amount of musicians, budget, coordination, and rehearsal time to pull it off. This goes to show how good of a song this is that the band didn't even attempt to play it live unless they knew they had everything they needed to recreate the experience "La Cantata del Diablo" provides when you listen to the studio version.

"La Cantata del Diablo" uses satanic imagery (the whole album does, actually) and it attacks very harshly the catholic church. The song doesn't wait any time by starting with a choir singing in latin "In the name of the devil and Belial, Satan, Lucifer, Astaroth, and Yahweh". As mentioned in the disclaimer, this in itself might be controversial and offensive to many, but bare in mind the following: The religious imagery used in the song is a metaphor for the greater issue at hand. Mägo de Oz is not a band of Satan Worshippers criticizing Catholicism but attacking the idea of Religion and how people have corrupted it to benefit their own needs and control the masses. Why from a perspective of  Satanism? Well, the simple answer is "they're a metal band". However, while there is Satanic imagery, the main character doesn't worship Satan in actuality, but Gaia. In fact, the story of "La Cantata del Diablo" is about an Aztec named Azaak who is captured by the sent to burn to death by the Inquisition for refusing to convert and be baptized. Satanism doesn't play a direct part on the narrative or the content of the song, but I do believe it plays a part on the theme of the song (and the band as a whole). In my research on Satanism, one of the things that jumped out to me were the values of Independence, Respect, and Education and Knowledge which is almost one to one with the philosophy of Mägo de Oz in general. If I could sum up the creed of the song and the band with one line it would be "In the name of Freedom, Faith in Oneself, and Peace, burn down the flags and say 'no' to religion. And may your god be a song written from the heart, and may your country be wherever your feet take you". Despite "La Cantata del Diablo" being a direct attack on the church and Catholicism, the song can and almost begs to be interpreted in a grander umbrella. The song is about freedom from the shackles of religion, politics, and a cry to break down the barriers that keep us divided as human beings. Although, on the note of giving the Catholic Church a giant middle finger, the song ends with a perversion of the Pater Noster called "El Salmo de los Desheredados" (translated as "Psalm of the Disinherited") which is just a brutal critique on Catholicism with lines like "It doesn't matter if you are a triune. With one willing to help would be enough" and "Our daily bread are rapes, gender violence, pederasty, dictatorships, and climate change". In short, its a showcase of everything religion has promised contrasted with what we actually have. However, they way it is written says that is not just a "I hate religion, and god, because it makes me angry" kind of criticism, but a call to action to bind together. The prayer starts "Our Father, of All of Us, of the poor, of the homeless, of the disinherited and those without protection. Of those who follow you and those who worship you no longer". We are ALL the disinherited, abandoned by this "Fatherly God". The prayer reinforces this notion by asking "What is thy Kingdom? The Vatican? The Banks? The high politics? Our kingdom is Nigeria, Ethiopia, Colombia, Hiroshima". It is harsh, gripping, and inspiring, to be honest. It's not destructive to be destructive. It is not dark for the sake of being dark and edgy. It is a psalm to break down the walls that have separated us for far too long.

"La Cantata del Diablo" by Mägo de Oz is a monster of a song and well worth your time. I encourage you to give it a listen and not let the language barrier stop you from giving this song a chance. I understand this song is not for everyone due to its length, genre, and sure, political, social, and religious points of view. However there's no denying the level of artistry Mägo de Oz has achieved with this song with well written lyrics, well composed and arranged music, and thought provoking message. "La Cantata del Diablo" is in the end a song of Freedom and Unity. When Mägo de Oz played this song live in Mexico, not only was everyone singing and cheering the entire song but when the "Psalm of the Disinherited" came up, the cheering stopped. The claps and screams stopped. Everyone began praying. Line by Line, every single line of the psalm resonated through the arena. 22 thousand people with their heads held up high as they scream to the heavens "Our Father, of all of us. Why have you forgotten us? Our Father, Blind, Deaf, and with nothing to do, why have you abandoned us" was awe inspiring to me. This to me is what the song wanted to achieve: a community of brothers and sisters. Music is said to bring people together of different backgrounds, ethnicities, creeds, and nationalities. This has certainly been echoed with bands like BABYMETAL where I have gone to a concert with undeniable hardcore metalheads and people how don't even like metal at all, or Miyavi who practices this philosophy and uses it to further humanitarian efforts. "La Cantata del Diablo" is the song, to me, that actively tries to achieve this through its powerful and enticing music.

Avengers: Infinity War (Quick Analysis)

As many predicted, Infinity War was a big event and people knew that it was going to be big because many will die. What people didn't know is the scale. Reactions on social media and the memes coming out of the Marvel fan community have centered (on the most part) on how Infinity War left them emotionally wrecked. I went to watch it and... I think all these people need to watch Madoka Magica to know what being emotionally wrecked is really like. To be clear, the movie is good. It has the Marvel standard of quality: it's serious, dumb, funny, engaging, and entertaining in all the right places. Infinity War is a solid 8/10. However, the biggest impact according to fans failed in my eyes. Why?
To be clear, this is NOT a review on the movie. If you seen any Marvel movie, you know what to expect from this. If you didn't like it, you probably didn't like any of the other movies so why did you watch this one? Again, solid 8/10. Also, since I will be focusing on character deaths and the villain there will be a huge amount of spoilers (and in this movie, there are a lot, so watch the movie before reading this).

First, let's talk about Thanos. He is a good villain. Nothing more to say there. For a character that isn't really intimidating, everyone who worked on him really succeeded in making him a believable threat. Strangely enough, also sympathetic, which was a pleasant surprise. I felt for Thanos, which didn't make me root for him but it did make him more of a three dimensional character and not just some generic evil intergalactic schoolyard bully. So, what's my problem with Thanos? Well, not with him exactly, but what he becomes by the end of the film. By the end of the movie, Thanos obtains all infinity stones, making him the most powerful being in the universe. The problem with this is that not only are we told about what he is able to do with that power, but we see it. The Villain won. Creating a challenge for our heroes is fine, but Thanos defeated our heroes starting with one stone and now he has all of them, and half of the heroes are dead. Not to mention that among the stones he has, he possesses a stone that can warp reality and a stone that can reverse time (with no clear limits on these powers). I've seen this scene before. The anime Soul Eater walked through this exact plot line (Spoilers for Soul Eater, if you haven't finished it): Asura needed to do something to become completely invincible... and then he does. Then, this invincible entity that even Death couldn't beat is defeated by getting punched in the face by a 14 year old girl. The anime tries to shoe horn an explanation on how Courage defeats Madness (I guess using the same logic as Rock-Paper-Scissors) but I think anyone who has watched the anime can agree that it was absolutely terrible. The way Infinity War ended has me worried more about the writers than the heroes (more on that on the second point). Thanos, by the universe's own rules, has become too powerful which will lead to either a gimmicky Deus Ex Machina (which may or may not involve Captain Marvel) or some logically sound but unsatisfying ending. I will definitely see the next Avengers movie, but only to see how the writers get themselves out of this corner.

Second, let's talk about death. A lot of characters died in Infinity War, MANY of them unceremoniously. People's been reacting mostly the way they're supposed to: sad and mourning. I, on the other hand, am just asking one thing: "Ok... out of all of the characters who died, how many of them will STAY dead"? Here's why I don't buy most of the character deaths in Infinity War.

(Casualties: Loki, Vision, Gamora, Winter Soldier, Drax, Groot, Mantis, Starlord, Spiderman, Doctor Strange, Falcon, Black Panther, Maria Hill, and Nick Fury)

1) It was never established that a main character could die in this universe like in Game of Thrones or Mahou Shojo Madoka Magica. It's very unlikely they would kill so many characters this late in the game. "They killed Quicksilver" you might say, but Quicksilver was pretty much introduced to be killed. "They could go the Harry Potter route" you say and sure, that could be true, except that Harry Potter started killing characters  at the end of the series to make the War of the Wizards mean something in regards to narrative stakes, and to prevent the temptation of wanting to bring back the ones who died. We know that Marvel has plenty of movies coming (including for those killed in Infinity War). Furthermore, it has been established more times in the Marvel Cinematic Universe that characters can cheat death. Furthermore, characters have more consistently cheated death in this movie than they have actually died. To the point were Thanos had to break the fourth wall to tell us "Yes, Loki is dead. For Real this time". Death in this universe means very little from a reality point of view and an In-universe point of view.

2) Many of the deaths mean nothing to the plot. When it comes to characters who stay dead, Vision and Gamora would make sense because their deaths served a purpose. That's the kind of movie this is. Nick Fury, Maria Hill, and Falcon could stay dead because (like Quicksilver) they are not that big of characters to kill off while still being beloved to have an emotional reaction. But let's be honest here... Killing Doctor Strange is outlandish enough. 3/4 of the Guardians of the Galaxy, they are certainly coming back because you know Marvel wouldn't kill Guardians of the Galaxy 3. Killing off Spiderman after all the legal battle with Sony for his rights? KILLING OFF BLACK PANTHER!? Of course Marvel would kill off their most celebrated movie (which is still on the theaters, by the way, and has a sequel in production).

I can't feel emotionally invested in these character deaths because most of the Deaths in Infinity War are inconsequential. In Game of Thrones they established early on that ANYONE can die at ANY TIME (no plot armor for nobody). Madoka Magica killed one of their leads by episode 3. Establishing this in the narrative is not just for shock and stakes. It establishes a universal rule in the world we are exploring: Death is an unforgiving mistress. In the Marvel Universe this was never established. Death happened to make you sad or to further the plot, and even then, it was a supporting character or villain, NEVER a lead. So, killing off so many leads this late in the game is simply not believable. Furthermore, if Marvel tries to shoe horn all of these deaths as permanent, well... most are unsatisfying deaths. Again, only Vision and Gamora died in any significant way. Everyone else just vanished into a puff of smoke. It comes out of nowhere and makes no sense either from a business/marketing perspective nor a narrative perspective.